Propagated Error - 1776 to 2008 (and Beyond?)
By Henry Nicolle
Exclusive first publishing granted to The
Seattle Sinner February, 2008
Government grants our rights. Government actors are always right. You
can't fight city hall. Justice will prevail; that's why we have the appeals
courts. Presumptions.
Over the last half year, I have been ragging without apparent direction
over my arrest, jailing, naked in the Penalty-Box, enduring a kangaroo
prosecution and a meaningless appeal. From time to time, I have nudged
my story in the direction of why my petty complaint is actually an incredibly
huge accusation against nearly all of us, in government or not in government.
As Pogo once said, "We have met the enemy, and he is us." Presumption has
come to bite us in the butt.
In 1775, the presumption (in error) of our revolting forefathers was
that we would throw a fit with our government and they would recognize
that it was more profitable to throw in with our ambitions than to force
us to remain on bended knee to our "betters". When that didn't look like
it would work out, we abandoned those mistaken presumptions and fought
for radical change and individual Liberty. For the majority of our inhabitants
at the time, the new (erroneous) presumption was that the revolutionaries
would lose, things would go back to the "normal" state of society in the
world of that period.. Everyone thought they would have a couple stiff
drinks (I think all drinks in those days were pretty "stiff". Men, women
and booze were all pretty raw.) and get back to the business of life without
men with guns and attitudes running around causing trouble.
Well, that presumption didn't work out very well, either. We wound up
winning a revolution, changing the governing rules and of course, abandoning
the presumptions which had been crushed. We had to find new ones.
Frankly, this was magical social progress, (not to be confused with
modern social progressives). It was a change from "Know and keep your place."
to "Know your place is where it pleases you, so long as you're not standing
on someone else." We, in the Great American Experiment, were to be the
Captains of our own fate, etc. and we were left to figure out some new
presumptions.
What we did though, was to retread some of the old presumptions,
and reinstall them in practice. We were just too accustomed to the old
presumptions, we understood them and we were lazy. The presumptions we
restored were the ones that suppose Government and Society can manage individual
lives and be unaccountable for the results.
When it came to the moment to agree on the rules for government conduct
in our desire for communal powers to preserve our inherent rights and liberty,
we adopted a viable set of rules which could be read two ways (probably
more), depending upon whether the reader's world view was bottom up or
top down. This problem was not a secret.
It boiled down to Jefferson asserting that the Constitution granted
extremely limited powers to the federal government and that the purpose
of those powers was to preserve the inherent rights of individuals and
to protect the autonomy of self-determination necessary for the free exercise
of our rights. The resulting society of free men and women would set a
new standard of prosperity and achievement or fail miserably through their
own common industry or neglect. Liberty has no guarantees.
Jefferson was contradicted in purpose by Hamilton. Hamilton intended
that the Constitution enable a powerful central government, ruling the
People, establishing the policies of the society and goals of industry,
coercing labor to create the wealth necessary to pay the taxes which would
be imposed to pay the national debt which would be borrowed to improve
the power and prestige of the government. Central Plans remove the uncertainty
of Liberty.
After 220 years, Hamilton, aided by Lincoln, has prevailed. We have
a national, centrally managed society wherein we presume that we are self-governed
and free, that justice is likely, that our rights are respected and our
Liberty preserved. All are presumptions of the erroneous sort. We presume
that we are U.S. citizens. We are, but are we the citizens presumed by
our rulers or the Citizens we ourselves presume? We presume that our currency
is money and that we can pay our debts with our cash. We cannot, because
it is not money, it is currency for legal tender. We presume that we need
licenses and permits to do the various things that people around the world
all do. We do not need the great variety of licences and permits as Citizens,
because they are for activities which would ordinarily be criminal, unlawful
conduct. Have you ever thought about any of this?
Think about them for a while, because I will tie these in a nice little
Gordian Knot.
|