Policy, Power and Presumption
By Henry Nicolle
Exclusive first publishing granted to The
Seattle Sinner June, 2008
Writing about the failures of our Great American Experiment gets to
be a bore. The topic is mundane. The subjects of my criticism are
so common and so unconcerned that a futile hostility might be justifiably
inferred from my essays. I would agree with the hostility, but not the
futility.
Once upon a time, a kid who was born to a nice couple. The kid was O.K.,
very normal, except he never spoke. Not a babble, not a word at all. His
parents were concerned, but they endured. One evening, dinner was botched
but the salvaged meal arrived at the dinner table. The kid took his first
bite, and instead of his normal silence, he spit it out and exclaimed,
"This is terrible!". His shocked parents were overjoyed. "He spoke!", they
ejaculated. Then they said, "Sonny, you can speak!" and "Why
haven't you said anything in all these years?" The kid replied, "Well,
up until just now, everything was O.K.!"
Our self-governing "Once upon a time " is similar. We accept subjugation,
corruption, violence, theft and betrayal by our public servants because
it suits us that their conduct is O.K. by us. What unreasonable harm is
done to us is balanced by what we irresponsibly demand and receive of them.
Our decay into oblivion continues, for now.
I raise hell because the evil effects of corruption have reached an
intolerable level for my personal comfort. I raise hell because everything
between us and the people who govern is not O.K. and is fast approaching
irredeemably intolerable.
It may be that Hell in a Handbasket is already on our doorstep. Our
normal life is being up-ended by people in our government and we will not
like our new future.
We have allowed our rights and liberty to be purloined by Cindy and
Klopfer, et al. They have imposed the ersatz-liberty of government license
and bureaucratic permission. Our new quasi-liberty is fragile, easily denied
or restricted under this Devil's Pact. It is a fool's choice, easily lost.
Let me revise your view of our Great American Experiment. I know what
you were taught. It was deliberately incomplete, a deliberate fraud intended
to misdirect your understanding of our self-governing society. The fraud
perpetrates the subjugation of our lives and labors to the purposes of
liars and thieves.
We all know that we "Declared our Independence" in 1776, that we have
a federal Constitution and a "Bill of Rights". What we do not know or understand
is what these all mean in the relational context of a free and self-governing
society. The maintenance of our ignorance is intentional. Our ignorance
serves our bureaucracy and our leaders. It also quiets our consciences
when we suck up to power to unlawfully extract from our neighbors their
rights, liberty and property to be among the things and privileges we desire
for ourselves.
We invite and welcome our own enslavement in our violent pursuit of
things which are not ours by right. Our future is predicted by the ignorance
and arrogance of little Cindy Rojas, the thievery of Hubener, the treason
of judges like Daily and Klopfer, the mendacity of the "Special Cultures"and
the world-class crimes of our state and national leaders.
So, let me return to the Great Deception. We have fought an uninterrupted
political contest between expert-rule and self-rule from the very beginning
of our country. The isolation of our Constitution from our Declaration
and the misconstrual of our first ten Amendments as a "Bill of Rights"
instead of as their intended function to"prevent misconstruction or abuse
of powers" and to add "further declarative and restrictive clauses" has
allowed two and a quarter centuries of intentional abandonment of our purpose
for government.
Our purpose for government is explicit and unambiguous: It is to secure
the inherent, unalienable rights and liberty of each free man and woman.
Government can grant us nothing.
The Constitution crafts the means by which our individual rights and
liberty are secured, preserved and protected.
The first ten amendments provide clear guidance for construction of
the powers granted, prohibited and reserved by our Constitution.
If any law or policy is considered, we must ask two questions: Does
the proposal secure, preserve and protect our individual Rights and Liberty?
Are the means of the proposal granted by the Constitution? If either question
must be answered "No" or "Maybe", the proposed law is prohibited and cannot
be considered.
No man, woman or group can grant any of us a right which we do not already
possess and enjoy by virtue of our individual existence. People of government
can only protect or destroy. They have no power to grant what we alone
possess. Their incomprehension of these facts are the source of their errors
as public servants.
Our own ignorance is the source of my ill humor.
|