We often do things which damage us, believing a falsity
which "Everybody Knows".
"Everybody Knows" we all must have a drivers license or state
Identification card. When I was fifteen, I looked forward to being sixteen
with a drivers license. We all did. That license was the key to liberty
for a young man or woman. "Everybody knew" that they had to have one or
else submit to being a pedestrian, limited in liberty and property to foot
or bicycle, taxi or bus, or always a beggar to a licensed, superior slave
to the people who rule us.
Well, my Mom signed and I passed the tests, I voluntarily (by ignorant
error) surrendered my rights to travel freely and own and use property
and I became the proud recipient of permission to use the public streets,
roads and highways with my property. This was a rite of passage from child
to young adult and we all wore the slave's badge of approval with pride
and a sense of freedom from the pedestrian life of a juvenile.
It never occurred to any of us to ask why we needed permission
to use property we owned individually to travel about on property which
we owned in partnership with our fellow Citizens. It was not obvious to
us that we had submitted to an unconstitutional demand to surrender a set
of inherent rights for the privileges of a servant granted to us by a master
we had just appointed over our personal affairs.
If individual rights are not sacred and preserved by common agreement,
no part of society is safe from sacrifice on the altars of governing expediency
and social benefit. When the people we entrust to manage our public affairs
lie and trick us by sophistry, misdirection, complexity and other frauds
to surrender our rights and liberty, they have abandoned any claim to delegated
powers and take up the conduct of criminals, thugs, thieves and traitors.
Their so-called "laws" are nullities, treason from the moment of their
fraudulent inception and tyranny from the moment of their first enforcement.
Tyrants and traitors die..
"Do what I tell you, NOW!" and "Give us your (property or money) because
we just told you to do it!" If in doubt about the instruction or intent,
see the first demand. They have no uncertainty about their willingness
to kill us if we disregard their slightest demand. For example, "Let's
see some I.D.". This is an unreasonable demand under most circumstances
where not criminal conduct has been made. In addition, with few exceptions,
there is no requirement for any individual you carry a paper of Identification.
So the demander requires an impossible exhibit. If one does not provide
the demanded "I.D.", the situation escalates from a probably innocuous
encounter to what is perceived as "Contempt of Cop" and now becomes a serious
conflict of authority. Our government has a standard policy called "continuum
of force", which in essence allows or requires the government agent to
incrementally apply additional levels of violence to force your compliance
to whatever demand is made upon you, even if the initial and subsequent
demands are illegal, unlawful and criminal on their face.
By the way, I just mentioned a "conflict of authority". For those readers
who may not have caught that little understatement, this is the significance:
You and I are the supreme authority to govern in our country, not the cop,
not the judge, not the appointed officials and not our elected representatives.
When someone in government makes a demand upon your property or liberty
which is not justified at the instant it is made, your demand for an explanation
and/or refusal to comply is an expression of your superior authority to
command the one attempting to command by proxy authority.
People in government do not appreciate their subordinate roles and they
particularly do not appreciate your mention of the fact in their presence.
There are three examples of manipulative fraud used by people of our
government to illegally and unlawfully establish and maintain immediate
submission to whatever demands the individuals of government may demand
of us. These are the greatest and most deadly crimes of modern history.
The first fraud is the personal Income Tax as applied by the Internal
Revenue Service and the State Boards of Equalization or equivalent. This
tax is applied without support of law for the great majority of Americans.
The people in government know that they are illegally applying the law
to us, so we are not speaking of simple error or misunderstanding. We demand,
"Show us the law!" and they reply "We will show you the law by prosecuting
you." State Income Taxation is a subset of the federal Income Tax. Where
you have no federal liability, you have no State liability.
The fraudulently applied income tax is prosecuted vigorously by prosecution,
seizure and terrorist violence by people of both our federal and
state governments. It is the most effective tool for robbing our pockets
and coercing our behavior in the arsenal of unlawful government operations.
The effect of this criminal activity is to forcibly and directly confiscate
half of the value of our labor, eliminate due process of law and transfer
our inherent rights of liberty and property to the control of people in
government for their own purposes. What do you call someone who is not
allowed to freely control or dispose of his private property and who is
forced to labor without compensation for half of his life in the service
of another's profit and purpose? Slave? Peon? Indentured Servant? Whatever
you may call him, he is not a "Free" man or woman.
The second fraud is the so-called "Drivers License". Until a hundred
years ago, a free person could travel where he pleased by any conveyance
at his disposal. In the early 20th century, the internal combustion engine
was introduced and a variety of engine-driven conveyances appeared on our
roads. These new vehicles brought new dimensions of liberty to humans.
We now could travel in minutes or hours, distances which previously took
days or weeks and as a fantastic bonus, we could take our family, friends,
pets and miscellaneous property along with us with the same ease as traveling
alone.
The commercial opportunities were immediately exploited and as in most
public utility enterprises, were quickly and properly regulated to preserve
the safety of the public and quality of our common property, our roads
and etc. upon which commercial use was predicated. Since the automated
vehicles rapidly displaced the livestock of travel, a similar mode of identification
for mechanical equipment was implemented to replace the branding of the
livestock as proof of ownership. The California Legislature ordered the
Secretary of Revenue to accept registration of automobiles and other
motor vehicles, similarly to the registration of livestock brands. This
was NOT a requirement upon the people to register with the State, but a
requirement for the bureaucracy to accept the registrations of ownership
by the People. This was an additional duty, and was perceived by public
servants as "extra work for the same pay" and Legislation (law) was necessary
to impose the duty upon them.
... to be continued
Resources:
Traffic Infraction Document Scans
(Raw
Scan) Minutes of the Judicial Commission (pdf) 11.5 mb
(Raw
Scan) 1967 Report to the Governor and Legislature (pdf) 32.7 mb
Please visit again.
